Evaluation Matrix for Assessing the Sustainability of Wall Panels for Rural India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70917/fce-2025-027Keywords:
rural housing, conventional walling, innovative walling technology, evaluation matrix, sustainability, multi-criteria decision-makingAbstract
There is an increasing need for sustainable construction materials worldwide to reduce carbon emissions. Walling, being one of the most significant components of a building, has had various innovations and reinventions from traditional techniques. Although many sustainable alternatives exist for walling materials, they are mostly innovated for an urban context. An appropriate walling technique for a rural context remains challenging, as most often “one fits all” notion is applied in construction. Multiple parameters decide whether a material is suitable for a particular context, such as its technical, socio-economic and environmental characteristics. This paper reviews the various wall panels proposed for or used in rural areas as per identified parameters using the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method of TOPSIS. The panels are ranked based on their suitability for the rural context of India. The study indicates that the Ekra wall panels are most appropriate, followed by the CSEB technique. This system aids stakeholders in selecting sustainable and appropriate walling systems and making informed choices suitable for their contexts.
References
Agarwal, A. (1981). The potential of earth-based materials for Third World housing. Earthscan.
Akadiri, P. O., Olomolaiye, P. O., & Chinyio, E. A. (2013). Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Automation in Construction, 30, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004
Akinkurolere, O. O., et al. (2006). Engineering properties of cob as a building material. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(8), 1882–1885. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2006.1882.1885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2006.1882.1885
Beder, S. (2006). Environmental principles and policies: An interdisciplinary approach. University of New South Wales Press.
BMTPC. (n.d.). BMTPC PAC. http://www.bmtpc.org
BSI. (1992). BS 5234: Specification for performance requirements for strength and robustness including methods of test for partition walls. British Standards Institution.
Bureau of Energy Efficiency. (2017). Energy Conservation Building Code for Residential Buildings (Part I: Building envelope design).
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2005). IS 2185-1 (2005): Concrete masonry units, Part 1: Hollow and solid concrete blocks.
Calkins, M. (2009). Materials for sustainable sites: A complete guide to the evaluation, selection, and use of sustainable construction materials. John Wiley & Sons.
Camino-Olea, M. S., et al. (2019). Brick walls of buildings of the historical heritage: Comparative analysis of the thermal conductivity in dry and saturated state. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/8/082059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/8/082059
Census 2011. (2011). Data visualizations: Government of India. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/data-visualizations/Roof-Wall-Materials_Punch-Card-Chart
Chandramouli, C. (2011). Rural-urban distribution of population. New Delhi.
Costigan, A., & Pavía, S. (2013). Influence of the mechanical properties of lime mortar on the strength of brick masonry. RILEM Bookseries, 7, 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4635-0_28
Cuitiño, G., Maldonado, G., & Esteves, A. (2015). Analysis of the mechanical behavior of prefabricated wattle and daub walls. International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction. https://doi.org/10.7492/ijaec.2014.019
Dash, A. K. (2018). Evaluation of bamcrete panel as an effective walling system. IIT Delhi.
Dash, A. K., & Gupta, S. (2022). Study of bamcrete wall panel in the traditional Assam type house. Journal of Building Engineering, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104164
Dormohamadi, M., & Rahimnia, R. (2020). Combined effect of compaction and clay content on the mechanical properties of adobe brick. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00402
El Ezz, A. A., Moretti, P., & Nollet, M. J. (2017). Experimental assessment of stone masonry material parameters for seismic assessment of heritage wall buildings.
Heathcote, K. (2011). The thermal performance of earth buildings. Informes de la Construcción, 63(523), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.10.024
KR, B., & GP, H. (2006). Survey of sustainable building design practices in North America, Europe and Asia. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2006)12:1(33)
Kulshreshtha, Y., et al. (2020). The potential and current status of earthen material for low-cost housing in rural India. Construction and Building Materials, 247, 118615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118615
Manandhar, R., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. T. (2019). Environmental, social and economic sustainability of bamboo and bamboo-based construction materials in buildings. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 18(2), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1595629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1595629
Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. (2021). Compendium of indigenous innovative building materials and construction technologies: Indian Housing Technology Mela.
Ministry of Rural Development. (2016). Guidelines for construction of Anganwadi. https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/Guidelines%20for%20construction%20of%20AWC%20under%20MGNREGA%20in%20Convergence%20with%20ICDS_0.pdf
MoRD. (2022). Adopting green and new technologies in PMGSY.
Mousavi-Nasab, S. H., & Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2018). A new multi-criteria decision-making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A critical study on rank reversal problem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.062
Mulliner, E., Smallbone, K., & Maliene, V. (2013). An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using multiple criteria decision-making method. Omega, 41(2), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.05.002
National Statistical Office. (2018). National Sample Survey report.
NIRDPR. (2005). Blending the traditional with the modern: Cost effective rural housing technologies. NIRDPR.
Paryavaran Bhawan, I., Road, J., & Delhi, N. (n.d.). Environmental guidelines for buildings with specific reference to EIA Notification, 2006 [Item 8(a) of Schedule]. Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Government of India.
Pawar, A. D. (2021). A critical study to assess the hurdles in adoption of sustainable walling materials in construction industry. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/795/1/012007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/795/1/012007
Prabhat, et al. (2019). Study of compressive strength of fly-ash brick. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 8. www.ijert.org
Rye, C., & Scott, C. (2012). The SPAB research report 1: U-value report. London.
Sánchez-Garrido, A. J., Navarro, I. J., & Yepes, V. (2022). Multi-criteria decision-making applied to the sustainability of building structures based on modern methods of construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129724
Singh, S., Swaminathan, M., & Ramachandran, V. K. (2013). Housing shortages in rural India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25003/RAS.03.02.0003
Singhaputtangkul, N., et al. (2014). Analysis of criteria for decision making to achieve sustainability and buildability in building envelope design. Architectural Science Review, 57(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2013.783458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2013.783458
Venu, K., et al. (1997). Strength characteristics of stone masonry. Materials and Structures, 30, 233–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486181
Wan, L., & Ng, E. (2018). Evaluation of the social dimension of sustainability in the built environment in poor rural areas of China. Architectural Science Review, 61(5), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1505595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2018.1505595
Wong, F. W. H., et al. (2006). Factors affecting buildability of building designs. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(7), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1139/L06-022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-022
Yuan, L., et al. (2021). Overview of the sustainable technology system about rural residential construction. In E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123704001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123704001
Zhang, X., et al. (2010). Effects of computational domain on numerical simulation of building fires. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 20(4), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391510367349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391510367349
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-10-19 (2)
- 2025-07-30 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Future Cities and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
