Conserving Urban Heritage for Tourism Development: Addressing the Constraints Affecting Urban Heritage Sites Conservation Using FAHP Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70917/fce-2025-037Keywords:
alternative solutions, conservation, constraints, F-AHP, heritage sites, management, protection, Saudi ArabiaAbstract
This study aims to identify, analyze, and prioritize the key constraints affecting the conservation and management of urban heritage sites in Saudi Arabia while evaluating viable solutions to address these challenges. Although previous research has acknowledged these constraints, comprehensive prioritization of their impact and systematic evaluation of alternative strategies remain limited. To address this gap, the study adopts an expert-driven approach and employs the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to assess the relative importance of seven critical constraints and five potential solutions. The findings reveal that lack of awareness and appreciation (LAA) (27%) is the most significant constraint, followed by an inadequate legal framework (ILF) (23%) and a lack of professional expertise (LPE) (20%). Rapid development and urbanization (RDU) (4%) and insufficient funding and resources (IFR) (2%) rank lowest. Among the proposed solutions, improving legislation and enforcement (ILE) (37.7%) emerged as the most effective strategy, followed by raising public awareness (RPA) (24.1%) and fostering partnerships (FP) (19.6%), while allocating adequate resources (AAR) (3.5%) was deemed least influential. Based on these results, the study proposes a final FAHP-based decision-making framework for enhancing heritage conservation in Saudi Arabia. This framework integrates expert judgment with fuzzy logic to systematically prioritize challenges and align them with the most impactful interventions. It provides policymakers, planners, and heritage professionals with a structured tool for developing targeted, data-informed strategies that promote the sustainable preservation and revitalization of urban heritage sites. In doing so, the framework also supports heritage tourism and aligns with national development goals.
References
Abbas, H. B., & Routray, J. K. (2014). Assessing factors affecting flood-induced public health risks in Kassala State of Sudan. Operations Research for Health Care, 3(4), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orhc.2014.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orhc.2014.09.001
Al-Hathloul, S., & Mughal, M. A. (2004). Urban growth management—The Saudi experience. Habitat International, 28(4), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2003.10.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2003.10.009
Alhefnawi, M. A., Lawal Dano, U., & Istanbouli, M. J. (2023). Perception of students and their households regarding the community role in urban heritage conservation in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 13(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2021-0078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2021-0078
Ali, A. G. M., Elsheikha, A. A. A., Elbanna, E. M., & Peinado, F. J. M. (2018). An approach to conservation and management of Farasan Islands' heritage sites, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Conservation Science, 9(2), 245–256.
Alnaim, M. M. (2022a). Understanding the traditional Saudi built environment: The phenomenon of dynamic core concept and forms. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2022.102019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2022.102019
Alnaim, M. M. (2022b). Discovering the integrative spatial and physical order in traditional Arab towns: A study of five traditional Najdi settlements of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 34, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.33948/JAP-KSU-34-2-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33948/JAP-KSU-34-2-5
Alnsour, J., Arabeyyat, A., Hyasat, A., Al-Habees, M., & Aldweik, R. (2023). The impact of urbanization on cultural heritage buildings in Jordan: As-Salt as a case study. Future Cities and Environment, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.191
AlQahtany, A. M., Dano, U. L., Elhadi Abdalla, E. M., Mohammed, W. E., Abubakar, I. R., Al-Gehlani, W. A. G., Akbar, N., & Alshammari, M. S. (2022). Land reclamation in a coastal metropolis of Saudi Arabia: Environmental sustainability implications. Water, 14(16), 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14162546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14162546
Alqahtany, A., & Aravindakshan, S. (2022). Urbanization in Saudi Arabia and sustainability challenges of cities and heritage sites: Heuristical insights. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2020-0108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2020-0108
Al-Tokhais, A., & Thapa, B. (2020). Management issues and challenges of UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 15(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2019.1594836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2019.1594836
Alrawaibah, A. (2016). Archaeological site management in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Protection or isolation? In Cultural heritage in the Arabian Peninsula (pp. 143–156). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315575285-10
Alzahrani, D. A. S. (2016). Heritage, conservation and good governance: Enhancing the heritage law framework in Saudi Arabia.
Aminu, M., Matori, A. N., Yusof, K. W., & Zainol, R. B. (2014). Application of geographic information system (GIS) and analytic network process (ANP) for sustainable tourism planning in Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 567, 769–774. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.769
Badawy, S., & Shehata, A. M. (2018). Sustainable urban heritage conservation strategies—Case study of historic Jeddah districts. In Cities' identity through architecture and arts (pp. 83–97). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166551-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166551-8
Bagader, M. O. H. A. M. M. E. D. (2018). The impacts of UNESCO's built heritage conservation policy (2010–2020) on historic Jeddah built environment. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 177(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2495/IHA180011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/IHA180011
Baik, A. (2017). From point cloud to Jeddah heritage BIM Nasif Historical House—Case study. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2017.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2017.02.001
Bailey, D. T. (2005). Development of an optimal spatial decision-making system using approximate reasoning [Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology].
Balogun, A. L., Matori, A. N., Hamid-Mosaku, A. I., Umar Lawal, D., & Ahmed Chandio, I. (2017). Fuzzy MCDM-based GIS model for subsea oil pipeline route optimization: An integrated approach. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35(7), 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1269247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1269247
Balogun, A. L., Matori, A. N., & Hamid-Mosaku, A. I. (2015). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision support system for evaluating subsea oil pipeline routing criteria in East Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74, 4875–4884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4499-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4499-z
Bekkers, R., & Lazaj, E. (2024). Voting or consensus? An empirical study of decision-making in the European standards body ETSI. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2442948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2442948
Bozbura, F. T., Beskese, A., & Kahraman, C. (2007). Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1100–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.006
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) USA. (2023). The World Factbook—Middle East. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/middle-east/
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). (2022). The World Factbook: Saudi Arabia. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2022/countries/saudi-arabia/
Dahri, N., & Abida, H. (2017). Monte Carlo simulation-aided analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood susceptibility mapping in Gabes Basin (southeastern Tunisia). Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6619-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6619-4
Dano, U. L. (2020). Flash flood impact assessment in Jeddah City: An analytic hierarchy process approach. Hydrology, 7(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7010010
Dano, U. L., Balogun, A. L., Matori, A. N., Wan Yusouf, K., Abubakar, I. R., Said Mohamed, M. A., Aina, Y. A., & Pradhan, B. (2019). Flood susceptibility mapping using GIS-based analytic network process: A case study of Perlis, Malaysia. Water, 11(3), 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030615
Danumah, J. H., Odai, S. N., Saley, B. M., Szarzynski, J., Thiel, M., Kwaku, A., Kouame, F. K., & Akpa, L. Y. (2016). Flood risk assessment and mapping in Abidjan district using multi-criteria analysis (AHP) model and geoinformation techniques (Côte d'Ivoire). Geoenvironmental Disasters, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0044-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0044-y
Ding, R. X., Palomares, I., Wang, X., Yang, G. R., Liu, B., Dong, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2020). Large-scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an artificial intelligence and applications perspective. Information Fusion, 59, 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.006
Dwidar, S. (2019). Bioclimatic architecture for heritage residential buildings in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Environmental design approach towards providing thermal comfort in future buildings. JES: Journal of Engineering Sciences, 47(6), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.21608/JESAUN.2019.115750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2019.115750
El-Belkasy, M. I., & Wahieb, S. A. (2022). Sustainable conservation and reuse of historical city center applied study on Jeddah—Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(9), 5188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095188
Fu, L., Zhang, Q., Tang, Y., Pan, J., & Li, Q. (2023). Assessment of urbanization impact on cultural heritage based on a risk-based cumulative impact assessment method. Heritage Science, 11(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01024-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01024-0
García-Hernández, M., De la Calle-Vaquero, M., & Yubero, C. (2017). Cultural heritage and urban tourism: Historic city centres under pressure. Sustainability, 9(8), 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081346
Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Drobnjak, S. (2017). Application of GIS-interval rough AHP methodology for flood hazard mapping in urban areas. Water, 9(6), 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060360
Girard, L. F., & Nijkamp, P. (Eds.). (2009). Cultural tourism and sustainable local development. Ashgate Publishing.
Guzman, P., Pereira Roders, A. R., & Colenbrander, B. (2018). Impacts of common urban development factors on cultural conservation in world heritage cities: An indicators-based analysis. Sustainability, 10(3), 853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030853
Hassan, G. F., Rashed, R., & Nagar, S. M. E. (2022). Regenerative urban heritage model: Scoping review of paradigms' progression. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(4), 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.101652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.101652
Hølleland, H., & Skrede, J. (2019). What's wrong with heritage experts? An interdisciplinary discussion of experts and expertise in heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(8), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1552613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1552613
Holtorf, C. (2018). Embracing change: How cultural resilience is increased through cultural heritage. World Archaeology, 50(4), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1510340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2018.1510340
Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
Khalil, M. A. M., & Nasr, E. H. M. (2023). The development of legal framework for the management of World Heritage Sites in Oman: A case study on Bahla Oasis. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2020-0106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2020-0106
Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Hussain, S., & Yan, X. (2019). Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development. Applied Soft Computing, 83, 105648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648
Kordi, M., & Brandt, S. A. (2012). Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.07.004
Lawal Dano, U. (2025). Analyzing the spatial determinants of housing prices in Dammam, Saudi Arabia: An AHP approach. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 18(2), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-07-2023-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-07-2023-0101
Levy, T., Papatheodorou, G., Geraga, M., Christodoulou, D., Georgiou, N., Kordella, S., Gkionis, P., Spondylis, I., Michalis, M., Dimas, X., & Tsoulakou, M. (2023). Digital underwater technologies in the Methoni Bay cultural heritage project, Greece: Interdisciplinary approaches and sustainability. Sci. Cult, 9, 51–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7265745
Mazzetto, S. (2021). Sustainable reuse of heritage in the Middle East constrained environments. In Tropical constrained environments and sustainable adaptations: Businesses and communities (pp. 63–91). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4631-4_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4631-4_5
Mazzetto, S. (2022). Comparing the sustainable reuse of historical buildings. Ekistics, 81, 22–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53910/26531313-E2021812540
Mekonnen, H., Bires, Z., & Berhanu, K. (2022). Practices and challenges of cultural heritage conservation in historical and religious heritage sites: Evidence from North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Heritage Science, 10(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00802-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00802-6
Moscatelli, M. (2022). Cultural identity of places through a sustainable design approach of cultural buildings: The case of Riyadh. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1026, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1026/1/012049
Naheed, S., & Shooshtarian, S. (2022). The role of cultural heritage in promoting urban sustainability: A brief review. Land, 11(9), 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091508
OECD. (2022). Tourism trends and policies 2022. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/71dc1773-en
Ouma, Y. O., & Tateishi, R. (2014). Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment. Water, 6(6), 1515–1545. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w6061515
Papaioannou, G., Vasiliades, L., & Loukas, A. (2015). Multi-criteria analysis framework for potential flood prone areas mapping. Water Resources Management, 29, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0817-6
Piaia, E., Maietti, F., Di Giulio, R., Schippers-Trifan, O., Van Delft, A., Bruinenberg, S., & Olivadese, R. (2021). BIM-based cultural heritage asset management tool: Innovative solution to orient the preservation and valorization of historic buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 15(6), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1734686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1734686
Porębska, A., Godyń, I., Radzicki, K., Nachlik, E., & Rizzi, P. (2019). Built heritage, sustainable development, and natural hazards: Flood protection and UNESCO world heritage site protection strategies in Krakow, Poland. Sustainability, 11(18), 4886. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184886
Quiñones, E. Q., & Fouseki, K. (2022). Heritage conservation as a social process: Assessing social impacts of participatory cultural heritage conservation. In Routledge handbook of sustainable heritage (pp. 138–153). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038955-13
Reuters. (2024, October 30). Saudi Arabia pushes ahead with economic transformation, minister says. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-doubling-down-economic-transformation-plan-finance-minister-says-2024-10-30/
Saaty, T. L., & Sagir, M. (2009). Extending the measurement of tangibles to intangibles. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622009003247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622009003247
Saleem, M., Blaisi, N. I., Alshamrani, O. S. D., & Al-Barjis, A. (2019). Fundamental investigation of solid waste generation and disposal behaviour in higher education institute in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Indoor and Built Environment, 28(7), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18804853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18804853
Saudi Vision 2030. (n.d.). Vision 2030, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/rc0b5oy1/saudi_vision203.pdf
Sodangi, M., & Kazmi, Z. A. (2023). Investigating the constraints for managing the protection of historic buildings in remote areas of Saudi Arabia: A DEMATEL modelling approach. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 13(4), 952–963. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2021-0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2021-0140
Torfi, F., Farahani, R. Z., & Rezapour, S. (2010). Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. Applied Soft Computing, 10(2), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.021
Udeaja, C., Trillo, C., Awuah, K. G., Makore, B. C., Patel, D. A., Mansuri, L. E., & Jha, K. N. (2020). Urban heritage conservation and rapid urbanization: Insights from Surat, India. Sustainability, 12(6), 2172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062172
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape. https://whc.unesco.org/en/hul/
UNESCO. (2023). The art collection of UNESCO. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387163
UNESCO. (n.d.). World Heritage Convention: Saudi Arabia. https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/sa
Verma, R., & Koul, S. (2012). Dynamic vendor selection: A fuzzy AHP approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i2.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v4i2.25
Yung, H. K. E., & Chan, H. W. E. (2012). Critical social sustainability factors in urban conservation: The case of the central police station compound in Hong Kong. Facilities, 30(9–10), 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771211235224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771211235224
Zia-ud-Din, M. (2024). The international legal framework governing the protection of cultural heritage. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Fall2024/4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Fall2024/4
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-10-19 (2)
- 2025-10-09 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Future Cities and Environment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.