Performance Investigation on the Heat Transfer of Composite rGO-SiO₂ Nanofluid in a Radiator

Authors

  • Luke Ajuka University of South Africa Author
  • Christopher Enweremadu University of South Africa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70917/fce-2025-036

Keywords:

modified hummer’s technique, hybrid nanofluid, heat transfer, thermal conductivity ratio, nusselt number correlation

Abstract

High-performing cooling fluids are increasingly gaining prominence in thermal applications due to their superior heat transfer (HT) features compared to conventional coolants. This is attributed to the sub-optimal cooling and heat transfer limitations by conventional coolants. Reports reveal that HT enhancement includes different modifications to the radiator for effective heat dissipation, engineered suspensions of nanoparticles in base fluids ensures the direct deployment of existing radiators. In this study, reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanoparticle was prepared by modified Hummer’s technique via reduction process, with graphite powder as starting material, while silicon dioxide (SiO₂) was commercially sought. A comparative study was conducted to investigate the heat transfer of de-ionised (DI) water-based rGO-SiO₂ against its individual make-ups (rGO and SiO₂). At different volumetric concentrations (0.1%–0.3%) and temperature (20-60°C), SiO₂-rGO|0.3 composite nanofluid achieved a thermal conductivity (TC) enhancement of 16.8%, 9.4%, 7.1%, and 1.8% over the DI-Water, SiO₂|0.1, rGO|0.1, and SiO₂|0.3, which suggest a quick temperature equalization and better heat dissipation potential via Brownian motion, but 0.6% lower Tc compared to rGO|0.3 nanofluid. The viscosities of SiO₂|0.1, rGO|0.1, SiO₂|0.3, rGO|0.3 and SiO₂-rGO|0.3 nanofluids increased by 4.5%, 8.8%, 12.2%, 17.0%, and 14.0%, respectively, which may lead to an increase in pumping power demand, however, the positive figure of merit (TCR>1.0) justifies the nanofluids as better alternative to the basefluid. Furthermore, the Nu values of DI-Water/rGO SiO₂|0.3 was enhanced by 27.4%, 11.6%, 13.2%, 7.6% and 3.9% over the basefluid, SiO₂|0.1, rGO|0.1, SiO₂|0.3 and rGO|0.3 nanofluids, with an observable Nu increment of 3.71% and 8.87% of SiO|0.3 and rGO|0.3 compared to SiO|0.1 and rGO|0.1, respectively. In conclusion, TC ratio of the nanofluids were above unity, indicating enhanced heat transfer capability of the nanofluids compared to the base-fluid, and the MATLAB implementation of the proposed nusselt number correlation, fitted from experimental data achieved an R2 = 0.964. 

Author Biography

  • Christopher Enweremadu, University of South Africa

    Professor Christopher Enweremadu is in the Department of Mechanical, Bioresources and Biomedical Engineering, University of South Africa.

References

Aydin, D., Jarimi, H., Yuksel, B., Utlu, Z., & Riffat, S. (2025). Experimental investigation of a vertical flow moving bed thermochemical heat storage. Energy Catalyst, 1, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.61552/EC.2025.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61552/EC.2025.005

Cuce, P. M. (2025). Evaporative cooling technologies: From past to present. Journal of Global Decarbonisation, 2025(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.17184/EAC.9493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17184/eac.9493

Izzah, F. N., Kiono, B. F. T., & Rozi, K. (2025). Energy and exergy analysis of the XYZ ultra-supercritical steam power plant. Green Technology & Innovation, 1(1), 8099. https://doi.org/10.36922/GTI.8099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/gti.8099

Vadiee, A., Dodoo, A., & Jalilzadehazhari, E. (2020). Heat supply comparison in a single-family house with radiator and floor heating systems. Buildings, 10(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010005

Aacharya, R., Koirala, S., Khanal, B., & Baral, B. (2023). Comparative analysis of radiant and radiator heating system for a residential building. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1279(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1279/1/012001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1279/1/012001

Puttige, A. R., Feng, K., Lu, W., & Olofsson, T. (2022). Are radiators ready for the challenges of the future: A review of advancements in radiators. E3S Web of Conferences, 356, 03024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235603024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235603024

Li, J., Su, J., & Wang, S. (2025). Research on the performance of radiators in hybrid vehicle thermal management systems. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/WEVJ16020089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16020089

Dan, D., Zhao, Y., Wei, M., & Wang, X. (2023). Review of thermal management technology for electric vehicles. Energies, 16, 4693. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN16124693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124693

Gong, C., Shen, J., Yu, Y., Wang, K., & Tu, Z. (2020). A novel radiator structure for enhanced heat transfer used in PEM fuel cell vehicle. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 157, 119926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119926

Yakubu, A. U., Zhao, J., Jiang, Q., Ye, X., Liu, J., Yu, Q., & Xiong, S. (2024). A comprehensive review of primary cooling techniques and thermal management strategies for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC). Heliyon, 10(19), e38556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38556

Madheswaran, D. K., Jayakumar, A., & Varuvel, E. G. (2022). Recent advancement on thermal management strategies in PEM fuel cell stack: A technical assessment from the context of fuel cell electric vehicle application. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44(2), 3100–3125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2058122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2058122

Dika, F., Dagbasi, M., Adedeji, M., & Adun, H. (2025). Performance analysis of a wavy fin-and-tube automobile radiator operating on ethylene glycol and water based ternary nanofluids. Heliyon, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41509

Lipnicky, M., & Brodnianska, Z. (2024). The effect of a new approach to cooling the external heat exchange surfaces of a car cooler with air nozzles on the cooling process. Applied Sciences, 14, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062227

Bencs, P., & Alktranee, M. (2021). The potential of vehicle cooling systems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1935/1/012012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1935/1/012012

Pacifique, T., Sohn, W. J., & Choi, S.-B. (2023). A novel active cooling system for internal combustion engine using shape memory alloy-based thermostat. Sensors, 24(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083972

Porgara, S., Huminic, G., Huminic, A., Najibolashrafic, R., & Somayeh, S. S. (2024). Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers—A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Thermofluids, 24, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100945

Rahman, M. A., Hasnain, S. M. M., Pandey, S., Tapalova, A., Akylbekov, N., & Zairov, R. (2024). Review on nanofluids: Preparation, properties, stability, and thermal performance augmentation in heat transfer applications. ACS Omega, 9(30), 32268–33302. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03279

Zango, Z. U., Ibnaouf, K. H., Garba, A., Aldaghri, O., Wadi, I. A., Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A., & Baigenzhenov, O. (2025). Advances in green synthesis, modification strategies, and photocatalytic application of metal oxide nanoparticles for organic pollutants degradation: A comprehensive and in-depth review. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 428, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127497

Hashimoto, S., Yano, K., Hirota, Y., Uchiyama, H., & Tsutsui, S. (2021). Analysis of enhancement mechanism for thermal conductivity of nanofluids by inelastic X-ray scattering. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 173, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121245

Anegbe, B., Ifijen, I. H., & Maliki, M. (2024). Graphene oxide synthesis and applications in emerging contaminant removal: A comprehensive review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 36(15), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00814-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00814-4

Malavekar, D., Bachankar, S., Pawar, D., Bagde, A., Patil, S., Khot, S., Lokhande, C. D., Sankapal, S., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Advancements in graphene and its derivatives based composite materials: A comprehensive review on synthesis, characterization, and supercapacitive charge storage. Chemical Engineering Journal, 501, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.157533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.157533

Haeri, S. Z., Khiadani, M., Ramezanzadeh, B., Kariman, H., & Zargar, M. (2025). Photo-thermal conversion properties of hybrid NH₂-MIL-125/TiN/EG nanofluids for solar energy harvesting. Applied Thermal Engineering, 258(B), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124607

Ali, H., & Sajid, M. U. (2018). Thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids: A critical review. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 126(A), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.021

Yi, X.-W., Zhang, Z., Liao, Z.-W., Dong, X.-J., You, J.-Y., & Su, G. (2022). T-carbon: Experiments, properties, potential applications and derivatives. Nano Today, 42, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101346

Quadros, J. D., Khan, S. A., Mogul, P. T. I., Hanumanthraya, R., Abbas, M., Saleel, C. A., & Shaik, S. (2022). Heat transfer characteristics of fullerene and titania nanotube nanofluids under agitated quench conditions. ACS Omega, 7, 47764–47783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05397

Reding, B., & Khayet, M. (2022). Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of fullerene-based nanofluids. Scientific Reports, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14204-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14204-y

Li, X., Chen, W., & Zou, C. (2020). The stability, viscosity and thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes nanofluids with high particle concentration: A surface modification approach. Powder Technology, 361, 957–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.106

Khoswan, Nassar, H., Assali, M., AbuSafa, A., Sawalha, S., & Hilal, H. S. (2024). Why carbon nanotubes improve aqueous nanofluid thermal conductivity: A qualitative model critical review. Processes, 12, 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040834

Elsaida, K., Abdelkareem, M. A., Maghrabiee, H. M., Sayed, E. T., Wilberforcef, T., Baroutajig, A., & Olabi, A. G. (2021). Thermophysical properties of graphene-based nanofluids. International Journal of Thermofluids, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2021.100073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2021.100073

Yusuf, A., Bhatti, M. M., & Khalique, C. M. (2025). Computational study of the thermophysical properties of graphene oxide/vacuum residue nanofluids for enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 150, 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13921-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13921-y

Hoffmann, R., Kabanov, A. A., Golov, A. A., & Proserpio, D. M. (2016). Homocitans and carbon allotropes: For an ethics of citation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 55, 10962–10976. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201600655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201600655

Bahiraei, M., & Heshmatian, S. (2018). Electronics cooling with nanofluids: A critical review. Energy Conversion and Management, 172, 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.047

Sharma, G., Khullar, V., & Soni, S. (2024). Thermophysical and photothermal characteristics of surfactant free graphene oxide, functionalized graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanofluids. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 0, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/02670836241274637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02670836241274637

Bharadwaj, G., Sharma, K., & Pandey, A. K. (2024). Thermal conductivity augmentation of reduced graphene oxide-based nanofluids and its solar application. MRS Advances, 9, 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-024-00828-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-024-00828-x

Hadadian, M., Goharshadi, E. K., & Youssefi, A. (2014). Electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and rheological properties of graphene oxide-based nanofluids. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 16, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2788-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2788-1

Cabaleiro, D., Estelle, P., Navas, H., Desforges, A., & Vigolo, B. (2018). Dynamic viscosity and surface tension of stable graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide aqueous nanofluids. Journal of Nanofluids, 7, 1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2018.1539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2018.1539

Ranjbarzadeh, R., Meghdadi Isfahani, A. H., Afrand, M., Karimipour, A., & Hojaji, M. (2017). An experimental study on heat transfer and pressure drop of water/graphene oxide nanofluid in a copper tube under air cross-flow: Applicable as a heat exchanger. Applied Thermal Engineering, 125, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.110

Bai, M. J., Liu, J. L., He, J., Li, W. J., Wei, J. J., Chen, L. X., Miao, J. Y., & Li, C. M. (2020). Heat transfer and mechanical friction reduction properties of graphene oxide nanofluids. Diamond and Related Materials, 108, 107982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107982

Kazemi, Sefid, M., & Afrand, M. (2020). Improving the thermal conductivity of water by adding mono & hybrid nano-additives containing graphene and silica: A comparative experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104648

Ponangi, B. R., Krishna, V., & Seetharamu, K. N. (2021). Effect of ultralow concentrated reduced graphene oxide nanofluid on radiator performance. Journal of Heat Transfer, 143(8). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051233

Ong, R. H., Iskandar, W. M. E., Yapp Joo, M., Khan, M. M. R., & Anuar Mohamed, M. K. (2022). Effects of natural-based SiO₂ nanocoolant on car radiator: Thermal profile. Materials Today: Proceedings, 66, 2734–2737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.505

Joshi, Khatawate, V., Banapurmath, N. R., Shankara, R. P., Sajjan, A. M., Khan, T. M. Y., Ayachit, N. H., & Badruddin, I. A. (2024). Experimental and numerical investigation of heat transfer characteristics of radiator using graphene amine-based nano coolant. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 63, 105389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.105389

Behera, U. S., Sangwai, J. S., & Byun, H.-S. (2025). A comprehensive review on the recent advances in applications of nanofluids for effective utilization of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 207, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114901

Abady, M. M., Mohammed, D. M., & Soliman, T. N. (2025). Sustainable synthesis of nanomaterials using different renewable sources. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 49(24), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-025-01316-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-025-01316-4

Mahian, Bellos, E., Markides, C. N., Taylor, R. A., Alagumalai, A., Yang, L., Qin, C., Lee, B. J., Ahmadi, G., Safaei, M. R., & Wongwises, S. (2021). Recent advances in using nanofluids in renewable energy systems and the environmental implications of their uptake. Nano Energy, 86, 106069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106069

Cakmak, N. K. (2020). The impact of surfactants on the stability and thermal conductivity of graphene oxide de-ionized water nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 139, 1895–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09096-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-09096-6

Kaggwa, Atkins, M., & Tarighaleslami, A. (2023). Thermal performance of selected nanofluids with surfactants. International Journal of Thermophysics, 44, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03271-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03271-6

Wang, J., Li, G., Li, T., Zeng, M., & Sunden, B. (2021). Effect of various surfactants on stability and thermophysical properties of nanofluids. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 143, 4057–4070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09381-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09381-9

Shamsuddin, H. S., Estelle, P., Navas, J., Ghazali, N. M., & Mohamad, M. (2021). Effects of surfactant and nanofluid on the performance and optimization of a microchannel heat sink. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 175, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121336

Moffat, R. J. (1988). Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X

Downloads

Published

2025-10-09 — Updated on 2026-10-19

Versions

Issue

Vol. 11 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Future Cities and Environment

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Performance Investigation on the Heat Transfer of Composite rGO-SiO₂ Nanofluid in a Radiator. (2026). Future Cities and Environment, 11. https://doi.org/10.70917/fce-2025-036 (Original work published 2025)